'Foundations of Human Development in the Social Environment Essay\r'

'Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you examine the foundations of tender evolution in the sociable environment. Address the following in your paper:\r\nDescribe the interactions mingled with the bio-psycho- accessible places of development. Explain the opening of human renewing and cultural competence. Explain the linkup between general systems surmise and genial regulate. The bio-psycho- genial proportionalitys of human deportment be made up of biological, mental and, brotherly factors that explain human behavior. The biological proportion refers to the role of biological systemsâ€meaning our bodies. The psychological dimension refers to the role of thoughts, emotion, and behavior on others. The friendly dimension refers to how individuals equal to various groups and institutions in societyâ€and how groups and institutions relate to individuals, or classes of individuals. fond dressers fire understand a person’s behavior through essential development. Viewing problems through a bio-psycho- brotherly lens allows a social worker to help clients solve problems and nab coping skills through an mind of behaviors and how biological, psychological and social aspects of is life plays a role in behavior.\r\nWhen a Social worker has a better discretion of a client and the relationships in which the client is compound in, the social worker set up set up a plan of action and the healing act loafer begin (Dale, Smith, Norlin,, Chess, ,2009).. The strengths perspective is a tool that helps aids in the understanding of people from contrasting ethnic and cultural backgrounds; vicissitude. Different segments of society render things much(prenominal) as hand motion, eye tinge and, other non-verbal communications in different ways. When a social worker cornerstone become skillful in cross cultural interaction, they will be much better able to help clients that are from different cultures and ethnic backgrounds. This pr oficiency requires intense observation, blue-ribbon(prenominal) listening skills, and a true desire to reckon about different cultures, beliefs and traditions.\r\nThe concept of human diversity can be described as a person or memorial tablet clearly understanding different cultures, languages, and beliefs of people and families from all around the world. heathenish competence can be described as skills, behaviors, attitudes, and policies implemented that assist social workers and organizations to efficiently convey with cross-cultural (socialworker.org, 2014). â€Å"Culture refers to integrated patterns of human behavior that include the language, thoughts, communications, actions, customs, beliefs, values, and institutions of racial, ethnic, religious, or social groups. ‘Competence’ implies having the contentedness to function effectively as an individual and an organization within the context of the cultural beliefs, behaviors, and needs presented by consumers and their communities. (Minoritywellness.hhs.gov ,Adapted from Cross, 1989).”\r\nAccording to NAACP.org, cultural competence also focuses on population specific issues such as health related beliefs, cultural values, disease prevalence, and treatment efficiency. A culturally proficient social worker can make the difference in the success and also-ran of their clients. In the human service field when a social worker has an understanding of human diversity and cultural competence he or she can better understand clients from diverse backgrounds such as those with disabilities, the elderly, and the gay and lesbian community (NAACP.org, 2014). ecumenical systems possibleness is comparable to business and industry in the expressive style in which it is structured. In the business world, inputs are managed by organizational systems to produce outputs. In the field of social work, social workers use resources (inputs) to develop processes and procedures to produce serve (outputs) .\r\nSystems theory can help social work professionals comprehend how systems establish and the put in of that social system. When explaining the radio link between general systems theory and social order one must describe the two individually. General systems theory can be defined as components, which are in transaction and bounded. The components complement a system that functions within an environment. A component can be anything and exchanges are any relationship that exists between the components. A person is able to be alive(predicate) of the boundaries because it is what he or she can see, hear, feel, or sense. Social order is described as the demeanor in which a culture is organized and the standards that are necessitate to manage the organization. Looking at what general systems theory and social order are separately one can see that both deal with groups and environments when works in human services both can work hand in hand when act to find help and fabricate goals for clients.\r\nThe general systems theory is used in all aspects of social work, such as children and families, policymaking, and advocacy. Social order refers to a comparatively stable system; institution, pattern of interactions, customs, and facts regarding society. To have a systems theory there must be social order. Without social order, one cannot determine the causes and factors within an environment that are causing a problem. Without social order we cannot provide proper treatment. Social order gives us a set of norms within a system. Without social order one cannot use systems theory (Mosby, 2009). In social services, bio-psycho-social dimensions, human diversity, cultural competence, general systems theory, and social order all work together to create a better environment for their clients, and enable social work professionals to better serve their clients.\r\nReferences\r\nDale, O., Smith, R., Norlin, J., & Chess, W. (2009). adult male behavior and the social envi ronment: Social systems theory. (6th ed.). capital of Massachusetts: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon Zastrow, C., & Ashman, K. (1990). Understanding human behavior and the social environment (2nd ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall. Naacp.org, 2014\r\n'