Running head : CIVIL RIGHTSCivil Rights in the unify causal agency from 1950 to 2006John Q . StudentWright State UniversityCivil Rights in the United States from 1950 to 2006One would hope that the United States would leave entered the mid-fifties with the difficulties of discrimination and race relations behind them . afterwards either in all , the Civil War had been fought and the ordinal , fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments , out righting thrall , prohibiting the infringement of rights without collectable process and guaranteeing the right to vote to all male citizens individually had been had been passed and ratified early in the reconstruction process . sadly this was non to be the eccentric personOn January 1 , 1950 the raising outline was largely segregated in areas with a game community of African Americans , the branches of the military had further recently been corporate and Japanese multitude who were natural in Japan , no result how long they had lived in the United States and how m each children had been born hither into United States citizens were not heretofore allowed to apply for citizenship . mountain of African descent were not allowed to exercise their right in the southward to vote due to poll taxes , literacy tests , and covert at loggerheads carry out . Throughout the United States housing discrimination prevented nonage citizens from describe houses in segregated areas . The effective law of the bring was not the above mentioned amendments , barely was establish on a stopping point handed down by the Supreme lawcourt of the United States (SCOTUS fifty-four years earlier in the end of Plessy v . Ferguson . In this case the Supreme Court had upheld a lanthanum State Law that required railroads to provide cost but separate accommodations for white and colored races and prohibited people from oc! cupying any cars other than the one designated by the railroad (Hall ,. 637-8 .

This law was only one among many Jim Crow laws that existed throughout the South that in effect promoted segregation in state-supported places such as restaurants theaters , sports facilities and in education . SCOTUS ruled that such laws was constitutional and that separation of races did not inherently suggest that one race was inferior or treated unfairly . In addition judge dark-brown wrote in the majority opinion that laws could not wee-wee the long-established customs of society . He justified his decision based on a long line of SC OTUS decisions beginning with the 1849 case of Roberts v . City of Boston which related directly to public schools . By making this ruling SCOTUS effectively had effectively eliminated the touch on protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in regards to raceIn the 1950s supporters of lucifer rights for all races prepared to attack Plessy v . Ferguson . On may 17 , 1954 SCOTUS ruled that Segregation of white and Negro children in the public schools of a State solely on the train end of race , pursuant to state laws permitting or requiring such segregation , denies to Negro children the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment - even though the physical facilities and other tangible factors of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment